Market access
Systems used in the EU need a clear route through the applicable rules, whatever the organisation’s location.
See which EU AI Act rules affect an AI system you use, sell or bring into the EU.
Four reasons to understand the legal route of each AI use case.
Systems used in the EU need a clear route through the applicable rules, whatever the organisation’s location.
The Regulation carries significant consequences. A reliable first classification helps identify where fuller work is needed.
Understanding the route early makes it easier to assign ownership, prepare records and make informed product decisions.
Where transparency duties apply, people need appropriate notices or labels. Good governance makes that work easier.
What does the system do, who uses it and what role does your organisation have?
Check one use caseBuilt to move from an initial question to useful next steps.
Questions follow the system, the operator role and the legal signals raised by the use case.
When the result needs a fuller review, AI Act Made Simple provides the legal service that follows.
Verified users can save the work, return to the assessment and access protected resources.
AI Act implementation timeline
The Digital Omnibus changed when the high-risk rules arrive. The milestones already in force remain in place.
Updated for Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, published on July 24th, 2026
Start with the level of support that fits the work in front of you.
Check one AI use case, its role and its main legal signals.
Start RRCSExplore the public guides, reference material and practical resources before or after an assessment.
Explore the guidesBring the use case, facts and available records for tailored advice.
View servicesSave assessments and access protected resources through a verified account.
Create an accountWhat the Regulation covers and where RRCS fits.
It is the EU Regulation establishing a risk-based framework for AI systems and general-purpose AI models. The applicable route depends on what the system does, who supplies or uses it and how the system or its output reaches the EU.
Providers, deployers, importers, distributors, product manufacturers and authorised representatives may have duties. The answer depends on the operator role, the system, its risk signals and the context in which it is supplied or used. One organisation may occupy more than one role.
It can. The framework can reach providers outside the EU that place systems or general-purpose AI models on the EU market, as well as certain providers and deployers where an AI system’s output is used in the EU. The territorial link and any relevant exclusion still need to be checked against the facts.
A useful first orientation distinguishes prohibited practices, high-risk systems, systems subject to transparency duties and other uses with limited or no system-specific AI Act duties. General-purpose AI models have a separate set of rules, so the four-part shorthand does not describe every obligation.
RRCS screens one AI use case for scope, operator role, risk signals and evidence readiness. It provides a preliminary route and practical next actions. A final legal conclusion requires the relevant facts and documents to be checked in full.
A verified account lets you save assessments, return to your workspace and access protected downloads. The Guide and Library remain publicly readable, while verification protects saved reports and downloadable resources.
Run RRCS for one system, then use the result to decide whether you need tailored legal support.
“For Europe to become ‘the AI continent’ that can attract the best talent, [we must] swiftly implement the AI Act”